Hillary Clinton Makes the Sunday Talk Show Circuit (Circus?)
Have you seen Disney's newest Animatronics doll? I believe I have. Apparently Hillary, Mrs. William J. Clinton was so busy with her campaign that she was unable to take time to sit down with the talk show hosts this Sunday Morning, so her handlers were clever enough to get the engineers at the Walt Disney Company to cobble together a most life-like facsimile of her.
At times I swear it seemed as though the talk show hosts were speaking to an real person. No, really the robot was that life-like. Isn't it amazing how far the Animatronics technology has advanced?
That's what occurred to me after watching her (it's) performance on all five of the morning talk-shows Sunday.
Hillary, Mrs. William J. Clinton, sat there with her eyes wide open and a smile frozen on her face as she deflected and danced around the questions being posed to her by each of the Sunday morning talk show hosts. Even her blink-rate was controlled to an amazing extent.
There were only a couple of occasions in which her carefully crafted facade cracked and we got a very brief glimpse of what lies beneath this highly camouflaged dedicated Marxist. Only a few moments in which the smile became a little smaller and more tight-lipped. Only a few questions in which her infamous temper seemed near bursting forth, but of course robots don't really have emotions, so we never managed to see the real Hillary.
It's too bad she was unable to make the appearances herself. I am reminded of the late actor Robert Shaw's description of a shark's eyes in his role as shark hunter "Quint" in the movie "Jaws."
But then, we must never forget that we are speaking of a genuine sociopath, not a normal sane human being. This is a woman driven by ambition more than any person running for President of the United States.
This is a truly frightening lady. She is as hardcore a socialist as Karl Marx or Friedrich Engels could ever have hoped for. When she lies, she lies with the practiced ease that a only a lifetime of deceit could engender.
Where John Edwards' eyes would be fluttering like the wings of a bat (an event which occurs so frequently when he speaks that for anyone to be deceived by him they really have to be oblivious to body language), Hillary's complete absence of anything remotely resembling a conscience, and her dedication to Marxist ideals...she is a true believer...allows her to speak absent those tell-tale alterations in her blink-rate and furtive movements of the eyes which normally and subconciously occur when one is lying. Only on rare occasions, when the questions put before her caught her off guard, did she suffer a momentary lapse in her generaly controlled preformance.
No Hollywood actor could have done a better job of behaving like a warm, caring, genuine human being. At times she appeared almost jovial in her countenance.
Yep it was quite a performance. The set was carefully chosen, the ever present black pearl necklace was in its place the hair was carefully coiffured, the wardrobe specially selected, the expression almost unchanging, the laughter meticulously timed to appear disarming and express her charm.
Heck, even Brit Hume said she came off "very presidential." Overall Hillary's Sunday morning talk show gambit must be considered a success for those to whom appearance is the most important aspect of selecting a president.
My reaction? Well you've already read it. There is no there, there. Know hint of knowledge beyond what she has been told to say. There were no unscripted moments, no off the cuff remarks. When she was asked an "inconvenient question," she merely deflected it and returned to her script.
That script was repeated with dazzling consistency on each of the morning shows. It became obvious what her campaign's plans were from her first answers to Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday; speak for as much time as you can, use up as much time as you can, limit the number of questions the host is able to ask.
This strategy, for the most part, prevented the unexpected questions. With time so limited, everyone knows there were only a limited number of questions the host is definitely going to ask, so by speaking as long and as circuitously as she could, she was able to limit the number of unexpected questions to about one per television show host.
This juggernaut of the Democrat Party appears ready to to waltz into the Democrat nominee without being touched. All she has to do is avoid screwing up and the nomination is hers. With so-called journalists being so decidedly deferential to her royal highness, it is difficult to envision any occasion in which her feathers will be ruffled and Americans will get a glimpse of the shrill harpy that lurks beneath her facade.
The most glaringly absent question for me was the follow up to asking her about her failure to immediately distance herself from the MoveOn.org advertisement accusing General Petaeus of being "General Betray Us. In a single response she compared the reprehensible personal attack against one of our generals in the field serving his nation to the sort of attacks which one regularly see (and which were for the most part factual in John Kerry's and Max Cleland) in a political campaign.
Drawing moral equivalence between two disparate and unrelated events seems to be a routine tactic of the Left. Hillary's response was to say that she supported a bill which would condemn "all such attacks." Never once did she directly attack MoveOn.org for their advertisement and never once was she asked to explain her direct attack on General Petraeus' integrity when she said the believing his report requires a "willing suspension of disbelief."
That phrase, used originally by J.R.R. Tolkien in describing the atmosphere one must create for the reading audience when spinning a "faery tale" was every bit as mean spirited and insulting as anything MoveOn.org said in their infamous New York Times advertisement, and so far, only Rudy Giuliani has called her to task for that attack.
To be certain, none of the Sunday morning talk-show hosts did so.
It is a sad state of affairs that someone so completely devoid of experience, knowledge, and ability has the very real possibility of becoming our next president.
Hillary Clinton is an empty suit. Her mind is as devoid of original thought and her suit as empty as is that of her opponent Barrack Obama-sama. One continues to hear Hillary spoken of as the most experienced and prepared person running for the Democrat Presidential nomination. If that is the case, then the Democrats are in big trouble, because she is a unprepared and dangerously naive as anyone currently running.
Like most Liberals, her ideology is shallow, poorly thought out, naive in its grasp of human nature, and as dangerous as anything offered up by Stalin or Mao. She is the ultimate elitist Liberal, and she has made it abundantly clear that she sees the Constitution of the United States as an impediment to her ultimate aims.
She has accomplished nothing in her life except as a result of being the wife of a very inept and careless president and a darling of the feminist Left. Her brief career as the Junior Senator from New York has been remarkable only in its lack of remark ability. She has led the fight for no legislation, routinely been among the last or been the last to cast her vote on every controversial issue, and she has remained safely in the background avoiding the limelight whenever decisiveness or character has been called for; yet she is by default, the front-runner in the race for nominee of the Democrat campaign for President.
Yep folks, that Disney Animatronics stuff is really amazing; so amazing that we may actually have an Animatronics robot serving in the White House as our next President.
Now that's a decidedly frightening thought.
Long Live Our American Republic!!!
At times I swear it seemed as though the talk show hosts were speaking to an real person. No, really the robot was that life-like. Isn't it amazing how far the Animatronics technology has advanced?
That's what occurred to me after watching her (it's) performance on all five of the morning talk-shows Sunday.
Hillary, Mrs. William J. Clinton, sat there with her eyes wide open and a smile frozen on her face as she deflected and danced around the questions being posed to her by each of the Sunday morning talk show hosts. Even her blink-rate was controlled to an amazing extent.
There were only a couple of occasions in which her carefully crafted facade cracked and we got a very brief glimpse of what lies beneath this highly camouflaged dedicated Marxist. Only a few moments in which the smile became a little smaller and more tight-lipped. Only a few questions in which her infamous temper seemed near bursting forth, but of course robots don't really have emotions, so we never managed to see the real Hillary.
It's too bad she was unable to make the appearances herself. I am reminded of the late actor Robert Shaw's description of a shark's eyes in his role as shark hunter "Quint" in the movie "Jaws."
"Sometimes that shark he looks right into ya. Right into your eyes. And, you know, the thing about a shark... he's got lifeless eyes. Black eyes. Like a doll's eyes. When he comes at ya, doesn't seem to be living... until he bites ya, and those black eyes roll over white and then... ah then you hear that terrible high-pitched screamin'."That's what struck me during her five interviews, how lifeless and terribly scripted she appeared. That and how shallow her responses were.
But then, we must never forget that we are speaking of a genuine sociopath, not a normal sane human being. This is a woman driven by ambition more than any person running for President of the United States.
This is a truly frightening lady. She is as hardcore a socialist as Karl Marx or Friedrich Engels could ever have hoped for. When she lies, she lies with the practiced ease that a only a lifetime of deceit could engender.
Where John Edwards' eyes would be fluttering like the wings of a bat (an event which occurs so frequently when he speaks that for anyone to be deceived by him they really have to be oblivious to body language), Hillary's complete absence of anything remotely resembling a conscience, and her dedication to Marxist ideals...she is a true believer...allows her to speak absent those tell-tale alterations in her blink-rate and furtive movements of the eyes which normally and subconciously occur when one is lying. Only on rare occasions, when the questions put before her caught her off guard, did she suffer a momentary lapse in her generaly controlled preformance.
No Hollywood actor could have done a better job of behaving like a warm, caring, genuine human being. At times she appeared almost jovial in her countenance.
Yep it was quite a performance. The set was carefully chosen, the ever present black pearl necklace was in its place the hair was carefully coiffured, the wardrobe specially selected, the expression almost unchanging, the laughter meticulously timed to appear disarming and express her charm.
Heck, even Brit Hume said she came off "very presidential." Overall Hillary's Sunday morning talk show gambit must be considered a success for those to whom appearance is the most important aspect of selecting a president.
My reaction? Well you've already read it. There is no there, there. Know hint of knowledge beyond what she has been told to say. There were no unscripted moments, no off the cuff remarks. When she was asked an "inconvenient question," she merely deflected it and returned to her script.
That script was repeated with dazzling consistency on each of the morning shows. It became obvious what her campaign's plans were from her first answers to Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday; speak for as much time as you can, use up as much time as you can, limit the number of questions the host is able to ask.
Highlights: Hillary Clinton on 'FOX News Sunday'"Center?" The center Hillary? Hillary Clinton hasn't seen the center since she was a freshman at Wellesley. She wouldn't recognize it if she walked "right" into it. For Hillary, Karl Marx was a centrist.
Sunday, September 23, 2007
WASHINGTON — Sen. Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential frontrunner, took several jabs at President Bush on Sunday while at the same time suggesting that she was working to move America beyond partisanship and toward the center.
The New York senator then went on to say that she wants to discuss the substance of issues —like her latest health care plan — rather than just attack the other candidates.
"I think people are ready to start acting like Americans again. They want to roll up their sleeves. They want to tackle these tough problems, and I believe we can. And I'm confident and optimistic that we can make progress together again starting January 20th, 2009," she said.
She also noted that during her re-election in 2006, she won over a lot of the same voters who re-elected Bush in 2004 because she was able to find common ground with Republicans and independents.
"You know, I'm not intimidated by all of the efforts to try to undermine what I think is right for the country or to come after me or Democrats personally, because I think we need to try to get back to the center," she said.
This strategy, for the most part, prevented the unexpected questions. With time so limited, everyone knows there were only a limited number of questions the host is definitely going to ask, so by speaking as long and as circuitously as she could, she was able to limit the number of unexpected questions to about one per television show host.
This juggernaut of the Democrat Party appears ready to to waltz into the Democrat nominee without being touched. All she has to do is avoid screwing up and the nomination is hers. With so-called journalists being so decidedly deferential to her royal highness, it is difficult to envision any occasion in which her feathers will be ruffled and Americans will get a glimpse of the shrill harpy that lurks beneath her facade.
The most glaringly absent question for me was the follow up to asking her about her failure to immediately distance herself from the MoveOn.org advertisement accusing General Petaeus of being "General Betray Us. In a single response she compared the reprehensible personal attack against one of our generals in the field serving his nation to the sort of attacks which one regularly see (and which were for the most part factual in John Kerry's and Max Cleland) in a political campaign.
Drawing moral equivalence between two disparate and unrelated events seems to be a routine tactic of the Left. Hillary's response was to say that she supported a bill which would condemn "all such attacks." Never once did she directly attack MoveOn.org for their advertisement and never once was she asked to explain her direct attack on General Petraeus' integrity when she said the believing his report requires a "willing suspension of disbelief."
That phrase, used originally by J.R.R. Tolkien in describing the atmosphere one must create for the reading audience when spinning a "faery tale" was every bit as mean spirited and insulting as anything MoveOn.org said in their infamous New York Times advertisement, and so far, only Rudy Giuliani has called her to task for that attack.
To be certain, none of the Sunday morning talk-show hosts did so.
It is a sad state of affairs that someone so completely devoid of experience, knowledge, and ability has the very real possibility of becoming our next president.
Hillary Clinton is an empty suit. Her mind is as devoid of original thought and her suit as empty as is that of her opponent Barrack Obama-sama. One continues to hear Hillary spoken of as the most experienced and prepared person running for the Democrat Presidential nomination. If that is the case, then the Democrats are in big trouble, because she is a unprepared and dangerously naive as anyone currently running.
Like most Liberals, her ideology is shallow, poorly thought out, naive in its grasp of human nature, and as dangerous as anything offered up by Stalin or Mao. She is the ultimate elitist Liberal, and she has made it abundantly clear that she sees the Constitution of the United States as an impediment to her ultimate aims.
She has accomplished nothing in her life except as a result of being the wife of a very inept and careless president and a darling of the feminist Left. Her brief career as the Junior Senator from New York has been remarkable only in its lack of remark ability. She has led the fight for no legislation, routinely been among the last or been the last to cast her vote on every controversial issue, and she has remained safely in the background avoiding the limelight whenever decisiveness or character has been called for; yet she is by default, the front-runner in the race for nominee of the Democrat campaign for President.
Yep folks, that Disney Animatronics stuff is really amazing; so amazing that we may actually have an Animatronics robot serving in the White House as our next President.
Now that's a decidedly frightening thought.
Long Live Our American Republic!!!
Labels: Clinton, Experienced, Hillary, presidential election, Sunday Talk Shows
What do you think?
To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below
posted by Will Malven at 6:04 AM
0 comments
links to this post
