The Amazing Narcissism of the Modern Leftist

Will Malven
10/10/2009

Nothing so amuses conservatives as watching the mutual admiration society of liberals in the wake of President Obama's Nobel Prize announcement. In the quaint little minds, they have scored some imagined great coup that leaves conservatives gnashing their teeth like Professor Tolkien's orcs.

The assumption is that the modern day Nobel Prize, in some way, conveys prestige and honor that others might envy, when in truth it has been so trivialized by those the Nobel committee have honored over the past several decades, that conservatives consider the award in a similar vein to being "honored" by the U.N. General Assembly...in other words...an "honor" most would prefer not to receive.

The mutual backslapping is manifest at many liberal blogs. At FireDogLake, after quoting the entire Nobel statement of self-justification, "Peterr" gloats:

"I can almost hear the screaming from Dick Cheney and the neocons as they get the news."

Talk about being absolutely clueless as to what conservatives believe...with laughter echoing across the entire world at the absurdity of granting the greatly diminished, formerly prestigious, award to a man who has done absolutely nothing in his entire life but campaign and make anti-American speeches...they assume that conservatives feel slighted...offended that Obama has been so honored.

Honored? Really? By receiving the same award as that given to Palestinian terrorist Yasser Arafat? By being granted the same award as Albert Gore, Jr. and Jimmy "I'm a Nukeyer Scientist" Cahtah?

If one looks at recent recipients, the tale is pretty graphic in it political agenda...anti-American, anti-capitalist, and anti-freedom. The list is rife with incompetents and appeasers, most of whom accomplished nothing in the actions for which they were "honored" and some actually caused more destruction and chaos than they eliminated.

Of particular note is the aforementioned Yasser Arafat who was responsible for the suffering and murder of tens of thousands of Palestinian refugees. By refusing to distribute the monies he received intended to assist the Palestinian people and keeping them in their refugee camps rather than improving their living conditions, solely for the purpose of maintaining the people's hatred of Israel and the Western Nations, Arafat kept his people living in squalor and privation.

By ultimately rejecting the peace proposal offered by Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin and to which he had previously agreed, he prolonged the misery of his own people and launched a 15 year long "Fattah" of terror and violence against the only democratic nation in the Middle East.

Truly Arafat represented the best of what the Nobel Prize has come to represent.

How about Kofi Annan and the United Nations? They were "honored" by these naive Norwegians in 2001...about the same time as it was revealed they had been working to undermine the international sanctions against Saddam Hussein's Iraq and doing so in concert with members of the French and Russian governments for personal gain.

Their actions directly led to the failure of the sanctions and the privation of millions of Iraqis and the necessity of invading Iraq. Again, true representatives of everything for which the Nobel Prize has come to represent.

I've already mentioned Jimmy Carter, sticking his nose into places it didn't belong and blessing dictators across the world. His intervention in North Korea directly led to them achieving nuclear weapons capability. He has "officially sanctioned" as legitimate, the obviously corrupt elections of Hugo Chavez (even as Chavez was shutting off access to the press of his opponents and pursuing a lifetime appointment as President) in Venezuela and Aristide in Haiti.

He has compared the Palestinian-Israeli political situation to South Africa and apartheid. He has defended such luminaries of the peace movement as Fidel Castro, Saddam Hussein, Mashal Josef Tito, Nicholae Ceaucescu, General Zia ul-Haq, Kim Il sung and Kim Jong Il.

A champion of freedom, our former president Jimmy Carter is not.

Then there's the International Atomic Energy Agency and Mohamed ElBaradei who have done more to assist Iran in their efforts to achieve nuclear weapons capability than any other party except for those who actually provided them the equipment and knowledge to do so, ignoring the certain signs of such activity and claiming absolute knowledge that no such effort was underway when in fact it was being carried out under their very noses.

I guess complete incompetence is one of the most important qualities in a Nobel Peace Prize honoree.

Albert Gore, Jr., the wooden soldier of Global Warming, and his little band of followers, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. What can one say about a man of such little intellect and such great ambition? Well he isn't all that dumb; he has managed to con an entire world into believing one of the great fictions of all time and made himself incredibly wealthy at the same time. Not bad for an idiot who flunked out of divinity school.

Gore's efforts to destroy the economies of all third world nations and to bankrupt his own nation are stand out examples of the liberal's mentality and that alone is reason enough for the Nobel Panel to award him their "prestigious" prize. Gore has done more to advance the world's desires for the demise of America than any liberal luminary since Carter and has proven his ability to cause far more economic damage than even Carter could have imagined.

Al Gore is the perfect example of the gullible fool who believes his own propaganda and is so arrogant in his ignorance that he believes his fellow citizens need to suffer for their previous way of life.

Now we have Obama...full of potential, but zero in accomplishments. The committee made this award solely on the promise Obama has shown of his ability to finally destroy everything great and noble about America.

Sooo...let's see, conservatives are supposed to be envious and angry because Obama received the biggest gag gift imaginable? Dick Cheney is supposed to be "screaming" in anger (or anguish) over Obama's being honored by a bunch of idiot Norwegian elitists who hate America and everything for which it has stood over the past fifty years...and most especially for bringing an end to the myth of socialist superiority by causing the fall of the Soviet Union?

These liberals are "epic" in their misunderstanding of how we conservatives think. We are witnessing one of the biggest real-time farces in history and, if it doesn't destroy America, conservatives will be in charge of this nation for the next century.

This is liberals behaving as liberals and believing that they have pulled one over on conservatives. It is very reminiscent of a bunch of teenagers making mischief and believing that the adults in the room are unaware of their antics.

Conservatives understand liberals better than they understand themselves; while to liberals conservatives remain an absolute enigma. This is so because liberals, being intellectually dishonest, are incapable of seeing their own foibles which conservatives see in glowing neon.

Conservatives upset over this? We might as well be upset at George Soros awarding another million dollars to John Podesta and his little band of Democrat warriors.

The Nobel Academy lost the respect of conservatives long ago. In order for one to be offended by the actions of another, he must first have respect for that other individual or entity, which is, of course, why liberals became so outraged last year when Rush Limbaugh's name was entered as a nominee for this same prize. Talk about screaming and gnashing of teeth...

I would be more offended if they had awarded the prize to President Bush or Reagan...that really would have been an insult.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!!

What do you think?

To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below