For Hillary: "It Ain't Over 'til the Fat Lady Sings"
Never let it be said that Hillary doesn't have grit (some might call it blind ambition or stubbornness).
The Obama propaganda machine, better known as the Mainstream Media, or the Paleo-Media, has been calling on Hillary Clinton to give up, go home, call it a day, surrender, face the facts, and quit since she first hit a speed bump in the Ohio Caucuses back in January.
Following each pronouncement of the end of her campaign from the know-it-all elitist MSM, and rumors of her imminent demise as a viable candidate, Senator Mrs. William J. "Bubba" Clinton has refused to listen to the "all-knowing" idiots like Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, and the entire staff of the New YorkLies Times and staged a Phoenix-like comeback.
Again and again Hillary has defied the experts, pundits, and Liberal elite within her own party. She has dared to defy the will of the very people who first lionized her and who subsequently demanded she end her campaign "for the good of the Party."
Well one thing we Conservatives have known for a long time is that the leaders of the Democrat Party are more concerned with the welfare of their party than they are the needs of the people, or the good of this nation.
We saw it in (then Senate leader) Tom Daschle's choice to launch an attack against Republicans rather than ask Bill Clinton to resign the Presidency for the good of the nation during Monica-gate. This self-admitted decision by the former Senator from South Dakota, set the "slash and burn," "take no prisoners" tone of the Democrat Party for the following decade and has, to a great extent, resulted in the unwillingness of Democrats in Congress to work with the President or with Republicans in Congress all the while blaming Republicans for this stalemate.
We who pay attention know better, and have known better for over 10 years. So it comes as no surprise that the Elite Leaders of the Democrat Party Left would expend so much effort to stop the "Hillary Express."
Problem is, they failed to take into account the fact that the sheer, brazen, uncontrolled lust for power, which burns in their breasts also resides within the heart of Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton has been the primary driving force behind one of the most ruthless, take-no-prisoners, political machines in modern history. For her to give up, simply because the odds were stacked against her, is so alien of a concept as to be incomprehensible to her.
As a result of Hillary's sheer determination to win the American Presidency, the Democrat Party has been forced to expend a large portion of what should have been anti-Bush momentum in an internecine war of historic proportions.
Liberals have been fighting with the "Even More Liberals." The Left against the Extreme Left.
The net result of this war within the Democrat Party is a rift that may be too great to overcome in November...especially with the "most Liberal man in the Senate" being their annointed candidate.
Democrats, caught in a trap of their own devising, have backed themselves into a corner so far Left, so far out of the mainstream that their selected candidate, Barack Hussein Obama, makes Hillary appear to be a centrist.
We have been here before. In 1968, the level heads within the Democrat Party beat back a relentless assault from the Left and nominated Hubert Humphrey to be their Presidential candidate. This so outraged the extreme Left of the Party, that it lead to a narrow victory for Republicans and put Richard Nixon in the White House.
As a result of this war, the extreme Left of the Democrat Party built a political coalition that ended in the nomination of Leftist Extremist George McGovern. McGovern was the 1972 equivalent of Barack Hussein Obama. He was the ultimate anti-war, Leftist-socialist candidate and he lost in a landslide defeat of epic proportions.
Obama's stand against the troops and the war in Iraq, and his words of defeatism are eerily reminiscent of those of George McGovern, who, as reported in the Time Magazine article "The Plight of The Doves," once said on the floor of the Senate:
In 2008, Americans are again faced with the choice between an extreme Left-wing radical whose number one goal is "retreat and defeat" in Iraq, and a moderate Republican who believes in our nation, our military and in the honor of doing what is right rather than what is expeditious.
In forcing Hillary to the Middle, Obama has wrapped himself in the robes of the extremists in the Left-wing moonbat portion of the Democrat Party.
This is the opportunity that Hillary still sees. The Democrats have locked themselves into a carbon-copy path of that they took in 1972 and which led them to an historic landslide defeat.
If Hillary can keep her candidacy alive, even in apparent defeat, then it always remains possible that she could convince a sufficient number of Democrat "super-delegates" of that argument. That, on the cusp of what should have been a resoundingly good year for Democrats and their party, could end up in a stinging rebuke, very reminiscent of the 1972 landslide Republican victory.
As opposed to Obama, a freshmen Senator with less than 3 years of experience in the Senate, McGovern was a seasoned Senator with 9 years of experience and a previous presidential campaign under his belt. On the other hand, it appears that Obama has adopted more from the McGovern Campaign than just his anti-war stance.
In 1972 McGovern too offered to give every American citizen a $1000 "demo-grant..." hmmm, $1000, sounds vaguely familiar. Of course in 1972 $1000 would have been a large sum of money, closer to $3-4000 in today's dollars. I guess Democrat votes have gotten cheaper over the years.
Anyway, look for Hillary to persist in this campaign, at least until the vote at the Democrat Convention. Believe me she sees all of these things I have mentioned and continues to work the phones in an effort to sway those less than sanguine super-delegate Obama supporters.
We may yet see a "Hillary for President" bumper sticker in November.
Long Live Our American Republic!!!
The Obama propaganda machine, better known as the Mainstream Media, or the Paleo-Media, has been calling on Hillary Clinton to give up, go home, call it a day, surrender, face the facts, and quit since she first hit a speed bump in the Ohio Caucuses back in January.
Following each pronouncement of the end of her campaign from the know-it-all elitist MSM, and rumors of her imminent demise as a viable candidate, Senator Mrs. William J. "Bubba" Clinton has refused to listen to the "all-knowing" idiots like Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, and the entire staff of the New York
Again and again Hillary has defied the experts, pundits, and Liberal elite within her own party. She has dared to defy the will of the very people who first lionized her and who subsequently demanded she end her campaign "for the good of the Party."
Well one thing we Conservatives have known for a long time is that the leaders of the Democrat Party are more concerned with the welfare of their party than they are the needs of the people, or the good of this nation.
We saw it in (then Senate leader) Tom Daschle's choice to launch an attack against Republicans rather than ask Bill Clinton to resign the Presidency for the good of the nation during Monica-gate. This self-admitted decision by the former Senator from South Dakota, set the "slash and burn," "take no prisoners" tone of the Democrat Party for the following decade and has, to a great extent, resulted in the unwillingness of Democrats in Congress to work with the President or with Republicans in Congress all the while blaming Republicans for this stalemate.
We who pay attention know better, and have known better for over 10 years. So it comes as no surprise that the Elite Leaders of the Democrat Party Left would expend so much effort to stop the "Hillary Express."
Problem is, they failed to take into account the fact that the sheer, brazen, uncontrolled lust for power, which burns in their breasts also resides within the heart of Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton has been the primary driving force behind one of the most ruthless, take-no-prisoners, political machines in modern history. For her to give up, simply because the odds were stacked against her, is so alien of a concept as to be incomprehensible to her.
As a result of Hillary's sheer determination to win the American Presidency, the Democrat Party has been forced to expend a large portion of what should have been anti-Bush momentum in an internecine war of historic proportions.
Liberals have been fighting with the "Even More Liberals." The Left against the Extreme Left.
The net result of this war within the Democrat Party is a rift that may be too great to overcome in November...especially with the "most Liberal man in the Senate" being their annointed candidate.
Democrats, caught in a trap of their own devising, have backed themselves into a corner so far Left, so far out of the mainstream that their selected candidate, Barack Hussein Obama, makes Hillary appear to be a centrist.
We have been here before. In 1968, the level heads within the Democrat Party beat back a relentless assault from the Left and nominated Hubert Humphrey to be their Presidential candidate. This so outraged the extreme Left of the Party, that it lead to a narrow victory for Republicans and put Richard Nixon in the White House.
As a result of this war, the extreme Left of the Democrat Party built a political coalition that ended in the nomination of Leftist Extremist George McGovern. McGovern was the 1972 equivalent of Barack Hussein Obama. He was the ultimate anti-war, Leftist-socialist candidate and he lost in a landslide defeat of epic proportions.
Obama's stand against the troops and the war in Iraq, and his words of defeatism are eerily reminiscent of those of George McGovern, who, as reported in the Time Magazine article "The Plight of The Doves," once said on the floor of the Senate:
"Every Senator in this chamber is partly responsible for sending 50,000 young Americans to an early grave. This chamber reeks of blood.The entire debate over Iraq is eerily reminiscent of the debate over Viet Nam, as that same article goes on to say:
Scathingly, McGovern argued that "it does not take any courage at all for a Congressman or a Senator or a President to wrap himself in the flag and say we are staying in Viet Nam—because it is not our blood that is being shed." But, he predicted, the young men who are sent to fight "will some day curse us for our pitiful willingness to let the Executive carry the burden that the Constitution places on us." McGovern claimed that his fellow Senators had contributed to "that human wreckage all across our land—young men without legs or arms or genitals or faces—or hopes."
A prevailing argument was voiced by Kansas Republican Robert Dole, who dismissed the measure as "a shallow appeal to the emotions and anxieties of good Americans, who are weary of seven years of war." He contended that the Senate ought to express its confidence that President Nixon was moving toward "peace with honor, rather than retreat and defeat." Some antiwar critics of the Administration cast negative votes in the belief that a withdrawal deadline would hinder rather than help peace negotiations.The words of then freshman Senator Robert Dole ring as true today as they did in 1970.
In 2008, Americans are again faced with the choice between an extreme Left-wing radical whose number one goal is "retreat and defeat" in Iraq, and a moderate Republican who believes in our nation, our military and in the honor of doing what is right rather than what is expeditious.
In forcing Hillary to the Middle, Obama has wrapped himself in the robes of the extremists in the Left-wing moonbat portion of the Democrat Party.
This is the opportunity that Hillary still sees. The Democrats have locked themselves into a carbon-copy path of that they took in 1972 and which led them to an historic landslide defeat.
If Hillary can keep her candidacy alive, even in apparent defeat, then it always remains possible that she could convince a sufficient number of Democrat "super-delegates" of that argument. That, on the cusp of what should have been a resoundingly good year for Democrats and their party, could end up in a stinging rebuke, very reminiscent of the 1972 landslide Republican victory.
As opposed to Obama, a freshmen Senator with less than 3 years of experience in the Senate, McGovern was a seasoned Senator with 9 years of experience and a previous presidential campaign under his belt. On the other hand, it appears that Obama has adopted more from the McGovern Campaign than just his anti-war stance.
In 1972 McGovern too offered to give every American citizen a $1000 "demo-grant..." hmmm, $1000, sounds vaguely familiar. Of course in 1972 $1000 would have been a large sum of money, closer to $3-4000 in today's dollars. I guess Democrat votes have gotten cheaper over the years.
Anyway, look for Hillary to persist in this campaign, at least until the vote at the Democrat Convention. Believe me she sees all of these things I have mentioned and continues to work the phones in an effort to sway those less than sanguine super-delegate Obama supporters.
We may yet see a "Hillary for President" bumper sticker in November.
Long Live Our American Republic!!!
What do you think?
To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below
posted by Will Malven at 8:04 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home