McCain's Melanoma...And So the Attacks Begin
This is just the start. McCain's age is ripe for attack and the Dems have already begun to make little cutting remarks and ask questions about his capability of withstanding the rigors of being President of the United States of America.
Democrats are nothing if not ruthless and hateful in their political tactics. Remember it was Al Gore, not George Bush who first floated the Willie Horton issue in the 1988 presidential campaign. So why would anyone be surprised by this latest "trial balloon" being floated by the Democrat Party surrogates in the MSM?
This from the International Herald Tribune (by way of the Drudge Report):
Little spoken on the campaign trail: McCain's bouts with melanomaUhhh yeah Lawrence, little spoken of, but you don't mind speaking of it do you? This is the old "Not to mention McCain's melanoma problem, but did you know about McCain's melanoma problem? Not that it's any big deal, but do you think it might be a big deal that McCain has had melanoma? Oh yeah, it has been in remission for sometime, but you never know..." ad infinitum, ad nauseum routine that Liberals like to play.
By Lawrence K. Altman
March 9, 2008
Along with his signature bright white hair, the most striking aspects of Senator John McCain's physical appearance are his puffy left cheek and the scar that runs down the back of his neck.
The marks are cosmetic reminders of the melanoma surgery he underwent in August 2000. McCain, the presumed Republican presidential nominee, sometimes tells audiences that he has "more scars than Frankenstein."
The operation was performed mainly to determine whether the melanoma, a potentially fatal form of skin cancer, had spread from his left temple to a key lymph node in his neck; a preliminary pathology test at the time showed that it had not.
But because such a test cannot be definitive, the surgeons, with McCain's advance permission, removed the surrounding lymph nodes and part of the parotid gland, which produces saliva, in the same operation, which lasted five and a half hours.
The final pathology analysis showed no evidence of spread of the melanoma, his staff said at the time. McCain, of Arizona, has said he did not need chemotherapy or radiation.
These Liberal media types are so predictable. Now that Senator John McCain, their favorite Republican, has been forced upon the Republican Party largely by RINO's and the Republican machine, with the assistance of large crossover voting by Liberals hoping to influence the Republican ticket, the MSM who have championed McCain, can begin to tear him down.
The goal of these "off-hand" comments is to try and find some issue that will stick to McCain and torpedo his Presidential aspirations. In pursuing this, the Leftist media will spare no effort. They want a female or black Democrat as president and they will do whatever's necessary to make it happen, even if it means tearing down someone they admire.
I have made it clear that I do not like McCain as a prospective president and that I am disinclined to vote for his election, but these kinds of below the belt attacks cannot be allowed to go unchallenged. This is an attempted political assassination by implication and association. Lawrence and his fellow hit teams don't care whether McCain is likely to face further difficulties with cancer, they only wish to raise the issue in an effort to skewer his presidential campaign.
I still have not decided whether or not I will support McCain in the general election, but the more of these attacks I see and the more I hear Hillary and Barack promote pure socialism, the closer I draw to voting for McCain. I may have to take an air-sickness bag with me to the voting booth, but I could very well wind up voting for him.
All the Democrats are offering us is a return to the failed policies of the sixties and seventies, with huge increases in welfare spending, socialized medicine, and high marginal tax-rates. They want to return to the failed socialism of the past.
The rest of the Western world is moving in the opposite direction, moving toward more capitalist economies.
It's true that Obama offers us change. Hillary offers us change as well. They will be real vessels for change. The problem is the change they are offering is a big step backwards into the dark years of Lyndon Johnson and Jimmy Carter. The change they offer is change for the worse. They will lead us down the path to lower employment, sluggish economies, and rampant inflation; the "malaise" of Jimmy Carter's term.
I have seen the "future" that Hillary and Barack offer. I lived through it and it was disasterous for the American people and our psyche. It was a time not of "shared prosperity," but of shared misery. Of course Liberals love misery. If they aren't able to complain, if the American people are not suffering, then Liberals can't relax and "enjoy" their lives.
Afterall, we are America and so we are the greatest evil on the face of the planet. Liberals believe that if one is prosperous, then they are bad and have done something evil to achieve that prosperity. Therefore they suffer from guilt at living in the most prosperous nation on Earth and continually seek a means of bringing that prosperity to an end.
Liberls dream of the halcyon days of our national post Vietnam depression. They were in total control of our government, everyone (so they thought) was properly miserable, so naturally Democrats were in Heaven.
Well we are now faced with the very real possibility of having to live through such times again, because Liberals have successfully crippled our education system to the point that younger voters are completely unaware of the misery that Democrat Party policies brought about in America.
The difficult task facing Republicans and McCain is the education of those young voters who have become so enamored of the platitudes of the Left. They have never learned the failings of socialism, never witnessed the misery that the false promises and empty rhetoric of the Left causes.
We definitely have our work cut out for us it we are to avoid another descent into the morass that was the misery of Democrat policy. It took the optimism and patriotic love of country that Ronald Reagan had to shake Americans out of the Jimmy Carter malaise.
I am not so sanguine about John McCain's ability to lift the nation up into the optimism of the eighties.
Long Live Our American Republic!!!








4 Comments:
BLAH,BLAH, BLAH BLAH...
Same old cheaplaborconsewervativechickenhawkrepukkklicant blather we have been hearing for years.
The stupidity of cheaplaborconsewervativechickenhawkrepukkklicants used to be mildly amusing. Now you come off as tiresome, angry sore losers who are NEVER right about anything.
Please, name me just ONE success of your minder george the lesser's administration. And while you are at it, name one thing that you cheaplaborconsewervativechickenhawkrepukkklicants have been right about in the last 15 years.
You can't so go ahead and call some more names and throw yourself a good tantrum. You are America hating scum.
Hey Mr. Hou-Con,
You have previously posted that John McCain is unfit for command because he is mentally unstable. So you should just shut up, suck it up, and not vote this year.
Lawrence,
John McCain may well when the presidential campaign against his eventual democratic challenger but history is not on his side when considering the factor of appearances.
Historically, overwhelmingly, among the final major contenders, the more physically attractive (as traditionally or stereotypically defined) receive the most votes in presidential general elections. This dynamic has shown itself repeatedly in political contests that range from small-time local political campaigns to big-time national primaries and general elections. Likely most notable in history in this regard is the much heralded “good looks” of John F. Kennedy versus his counterpart, Richard M. Nixon.
As much as people deny it because, I guess, their embarrassment to admit that “looks count,” looks do matter when counting votes. And, if John McCain wins against Barrack Obama, in the context of traditional stereotypical physical attractiveness considerations it would be an exception to the rule equivalent to a one-hundred year flood…and we all know that rare events do occur, rarely. For example, McCain stands at the national average adult male height of 5’9” while Obama stands 4-1/2 inches taller at 6’1-1/2”, one has a full head of hair albeit styled neither long nor voluminous versus the other with a thinning mane tending toward a classic comb-over style, and one has the look of age and health characteristic of a long-lived life while the other displays a youthful and healthy appearance characteristic of his age or younger.
Dr. Gordon Patzer
author of "Looks: Why They Matter More Than You Ever Imagined"
http://www.GordonPatzer.com
Gosh this blog sucks. Have you tried to get someone to do a face lift?
Besides that, I dont see the media attacking him on this.
They should be attacking him on the fact that he cant raise money, generate excitement, etc.
He bores the living hell out of me. So much I might not wake up to vote for his sorry ass.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home