Global Warming Farce Exposed: Scientist At A Loss To Explain

Okay now, you Liberal idiots are killing me. Check out this article from National Proletariat Radio (NPR). The data from deep sea probes are showing that there has been no global warming in the oceans over the past five years...years which have been reported ad nauseum as the hottest five years on record and as proof of man-made global warming.

As a result, scientists are at a loss to explain the data. Their answer? We must be interpreting the data wrongly. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Let's get this straight. Real world data doesn't match the AGW models, therefore the data are wrong? Such complete arrogance...

The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat

by Richard Harris

Morning Edition, March 19, 2008 · Some 3,000 scientific robots that are plying the ocean have sent home a puzzling message. These diving instruments suggest that the oceans have not warmed up at all over the past four or five years. That could mean global warming has taken a breather. Or it could mean scientists aren't quite understanding what their robots are telling them.

This is puzzling in part because here on the surface of the Earth, the years since 2003 have been some of the hottest on record. But Josh Willis at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory says the oceans are what really matter when it comes to global warming.

In fact, 80 percent to 90 percent of global warming involves heating up ocean waters. They hold much more heat than the atmosphere can. So Willis has been studying the ocean with a fleet of robotic instruments called the Argo system. The buoys can dive 3,000 feet down and measure ocean temperature. Since the system was fully deployed in 2003, it has recorded no warming of the global oceans.

"There has been a very slight cooling, but not anything really significant," Willis says. So the buildup of heat on Earth may be on a brief hiatus. "Global warming doesn't mean every year will be warmer than the last. And it may be that we are in a period of less rapid warming."

I especially like the last paragraph where he says "There has been a very slight cooling, but not anything really significant." Yea, I bet it it had been very slight heating, you would be calling it "very significant confirmation of global warming..."

Yep my B.S. alarm is going off at top decibels. You can always tell when Liberals are unhappy about the data they receive, they immediately and reflexively lapse into denial...which is interesting, because that is the precise term they use for those of us not gullible enough to swallow Al Gore, Jr.'s manure.

Yep once again, I hear the clarion song of Liberal mendacity. To once more quote Mel Brooks as Governor LePetamayne in his movie "Blazing Saddles," "Gentlemen, we've got to protect our phony-baloney jobs!"

That's what these AGW alarmists have been doing ever since the more level headed of our society began calling them on their Chicken Little pronouncements of doom and gloom. It is a pitiful (and pitiable) "scientist" indeed who must scramble to explain away data which don't agree with his pet theory, because he couldn't possibly be wrong.

The essence of science, of being a scientist is being open-minded enough to see and acknowledge when you have been wrong. The problems arise when scientists become so attached to their pet theories that they feel personally threatened when the vercity of those theories is challenged.

When that happens AGW ceases to be science and becomes religion; something that occurred several years ago. AGW as a scientific theory was a faulty hypothesis, based on gross an unsupported assumptions and bad computer modelling, which has been savaged again and again by real-world, empirical observations.

That is the reason those who have promoted AGW as a fact have done so on the basis of computer modelling, and those who have disagreed with the theory of global warming were the scientists who examined empirical data.

Thus we have what is a disconnect between what "scientist" Josh Willis is seeing in his data and what his faith in the religion of global warming is telling him. Such a disconnect leads him to make the absurd statements he makes in this article..."global warming is on a hiatus"...or as NPR's Richard Harris put it (don't laugh now, he's perfectly serious) "Or it could mean scientists aren't quite understanding what their robots are telling them."

"Scientist aren't understanding what their robots are telling them" because THEY DON'T WANT TO!

It would really suck for them if they were forced to find another source for their funding, so they just stick their fingers in their ears and go "NANANANANANANANANANANA, I can't hear you. Your not there. I'm not listening."

It's disgusting!

I used to pride myself in being part of the "scientific community," but that was before the scientific method fell victim to the publish or perish mentality of university life. In Galleleo's time, it was the Church that controlled all of the monies for research and which controlled the culture in general, so any research which revealed data contrary to Church doctrine was suppressed.

Now it is the Ivory Towers of Academia which controls the purse strings and the scientific community, so any research which defies the secular, elitist, Leftist dogma of Academia is suppressed or explained away as an abberation.

It is time for scientists to develop a backbone and reject the pseudo-religion of AGW and the secular centers of power in our universities. Science is not religion and it cannot survive in an environment in which theory becomes religious doctrine.

If a scientific theory is correct, let the data confirm it to be so. If it is flawed and the data show it, it should die and be replaced with a theory which better fits the data...that is the essence of science.

It will be several more years before scientists finally acknowledge that AGW is and always has been a flawed and incorrect theory, because too many "scientists" have their entire careers wrapped up in this faux science. Time for science to reject dogma and return to the skeptical ways of the past.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!

I (heart) Big Oil! By an SUV today!

What do you think?

To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below