McCain's Unwarranted "Disappointment"

Well I don't know about you, but I "shocked, shocked I say" to discover the New York Times, having helped the Left select Senator John McCain as the Republican Presidential nominee, have now turned on the "Republican Darling of the Left" and have launched an all out attack against him.

I guess this falls under the "What did he expect?" category. Can McCain possibly be as naive as to expect the New York Lies Times to support him in the general election? Give me a break! What did you expect, a ticker-tape parade? The Lies Times is one of the most Liberal newspapers in the entire nation.

Is it possible for anyone to be any more tone deaf? Clue for John...The only reason they supported you at all is because you have been pursuing their Left-wing agenda. Why do you think so many Conservatives oppose you so vigorously? What a joke!

McCain calls Times story on lobbyist "untrue"

By Jason Szep
Reuters

TOLEDO, Ohio (Reuters) - Republican presidential front-runner John McCain on Thursday dismissed as "untrue" a New York Times report suggesting he had a close and possibly romantic relationship with a female lobbyist nine years ago in conflict with his high ethical stances.

"Obviously I'm very disappointed in the article. It's not true," the four-term Arizona senator told a news conference with his wife Cindy by his side.

"At no time have I ever done anything that would betray the public trust or make a decision which in any way would not be in the public interest and would favor any one or any organization," McCain said.

The New York Times reported on Wednesday that McCain had a close relationship with a telecommunications lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, saying that early in McCain's failed bid for the 2000 presidential election, members of his campaign had grown concerned the relationship might harm the campaign.

The pseudo-intellectual pseudo-Conservtives who so enthusiastically jumped on the McCain band wagon because "He is the most electable," are now left looking as intellectually wanting as we who have opposed McCain have been saying. Fred Barnes, Bill Crystal, Bill Bennett, and Michael Medved, to mention a few have proven once and for all their absolute lack of judgment.

These same men have repeatedly attacked those of us who opposed McCain for not being Conservative enough and for not being emotionally stable. These guys attacked and sneered at Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, and those of us of a similar opinion who could see McCain for the Left-wing stalking horse he is now proving to be.

Now the Times and her editorial allies, having successfully eliminated the chances of any other Republican to win their party's nomination, are going about destroying their pet Republican.

The Times, like most of the Paleo-media, is a wing of the Democrat Party. They will never support a Republican candidate if he shows any sign Conservatism and he has been attempting to court the Right since he wrapped up the nomination.

Sometimes I dispair that members of the Republican Party leadership will ever comprehend the futility of "reaching across the aisle."

This is really pathetic and it could have been so easily avoided...next time, lets nominate a real Conservative.

Lie down with Liberals, wake up with rug burns.

Long Live Our American Republic!!!

What do you think?

To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below