Traitors, Cowards, and Liars in Democrat Congressional Leadership? Imagine That.

It now seems that the words of our Generals, and their expertise in conducting the war are being brushed aside by those cowardly Democrats who, rather than seeking a means of winning the war, have now voted to surrender to Al Qaeda, and Iran.

Treason is defined as providing aid and comfort to the enemy. The Democrat’s bill does precisely that. It is a bill of surrender, it is a bill of cowardice, it is…a confession of treason.

Be certain the the voices of our Democrat Party leadership are being heard, and heeded…not so much by Americans, as by the very people we are trying to defeat. I’ve repeated that statement here many times, as have many Conservative pundits in many venues; General Patraeus has once again said so in no uncertain terms.

The likes of Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi should be already up on charges of treason. Both should be forced to step down from their positions as leaders for violating their oaths of office. Attorney General Gonzales should be investigating Congressional Treason rather than answering inane questions from hypocritical jackasses posing for the cameras and hoping to get their pictures on the nightly news.

Anyway, here’s the sad tale coming out to the Washington Post:

House Passes Iraq Pullout Timetable

Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, April 26, 2007; Page A01

The House last night brushed aside weeks of angry White House rhetoric and veto threats to narrowly approve a $124 billion war spending bill that requires troop withdrawal from Iraq to begin by Oct. 1, with a goal of ending combat operations there by next March.

The Senate is expected to follow the House’s 218 to 208 vote with final passage today, completing work on the rarest of bills: legislation to try to end a major war as fighting still rages. Democrats hope to send the measure to the White House on Monday, almost exactly four years after President Bush declared an end to major combat in a speech aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. That would be a particularly pungent political anniversary for Bush to deliver only the second veto of his presidency.

Last night’s vote came after a fiery, partisan debate that has grown familiar after months of wrangling, first over a nonbinding resolution opposing Bush’s troop increase, then over the largest war spending bill in U.S. history.

“How many more suicide bombs must kill American soldiers before this president offers a timeline for our troops to come home?” asked Rep. Patrick J. Murphy (D-Pa.), a freshman Iraq war veteran who lost nine fellow paratroopers this week in one of the deadliest attacks of the war. “How many more military leaders must declare the war will not be won militarily before this president demands that the Iraqis stand up and fight for their country? How many more terrorists will President Bush’s foreign policy breed before he focuses a new strategy, a real strategy? This bill says enough is enough.”

Not since the Vietnam War have I seen such an array of sellouts. Patrick Murphy may have done his duty, and for that I salute him, but that duty doesn’t have any more right to his opinion than does any other American citizen, nor does, or should, his words carry any more weight and perhaps less, seeing as how his vote sends the very people who killed his “fellow paratroopers” the message-

“Keep on fighting, the end is in sight. Keep on killing American soldiers, their leaders lack the will to persevere. The American politicians are more interested in keeping their fat posteriors in office than they are in helping Iraq to become a free and democratic nation.”

That’s right Patrick, you are sending these murderers a simple and very clear message, “KILL MORE AMERICAN TROOPS.” For the sake of your party, you are betraying the very men with whom you served. You are no different from John “the Gigolo” Kerry-Heinz in his treasonous and poisonous statements made before Congress during the Vietnam War. Your words are guaranteed to do just as much damage to the morale and survival of our troops as did his words 35 years ago.

I have no doubt that your intentions are to save the lives you believe are being wasted in Iraq, but as has been said so often, “the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.”

There is not nice, easy, simple solution to the situation in Iraq. God and everyone knows that if there was, President Bush and the Generals on the ground would be moving Earth and sky to do it, but there is not. This war, however ill-conceived it may have been, now has only two possible results, victory-defined as a stable, self-supporting, democratic government, able to deal with its defense problems both internal and external, or defeat-with our troops returning once more, as they did following Vietnam, with their heads low, their morale low, their self-esteem shot, and their confidence in themselves, their government, and in their fellow citizens shaken. No matter how much false pomp and celebration they receive, no matter what kudo’s they are given they, and the people showering them with praise will know that such praise is hollow and, at least from Liberals, insincere.

Once again, we-the American People, citizens of the Greatest Nation in the History of Man, the most generous, the most successful, the most caring nation in history-will fall into the morass which followed our abandonment of the Vietnamese people.

Remember the morale of your fellow citizens during the administrations of Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. The future was deemed over for our civilization, survivalist cults and groups sprang up all over the country, and the President-if you could call him that informed us that there was a “malaise” over the nation (okay, I know he never used that word, but his speech was forever called the “malaise speech”). There has, from the very outset of this war been nothing but talk of defeat from these same bad actors.

It took a strong, determined, ideologically committed Conservative to rescue America from that terminal fate. It’s time for Conservatives to step forward once again.

Long Live the American Republic!

What do you think?

To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below