SCOTUS Strikes One Small Blow for Life

Well, well, strike one small blow for the return of sanity to the American justice system, the Supreme Court ruled that the infanticide of fully developed, almost born babies can be outlawed; how amazing. Seems that some folks still believe in the sanctity of human life.

I'm certain that the folks at Planned Infanticide...excuse me Parenthood are apoplectic over this ruling. Imagine someone daring to tell women that they are not allowed to kill their unborn babies. Why next thing you know they'll be calling for the incarceration of women who murder their completely born babies...strike that, apparently that is already against the law in some states (not so sure about Massachusetts or Kalifornia).

Data Lacking on Abortion Method
Statistics on Late-Term Procedure Among Most Contested

By David Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, April 19, 2007; Page A08

The abortion procedure whose ban was upheld yesterday by the Supreme Court accounts for a few thousand of the roughly 1.3 million such procedures done each year in the United States, according to the best available estimates.

Data on abortions -- particularly the types of procedures physicians use -- are among the more incomplete and contested health statistics in the United States. The prevalence of a late-term procedure that opponents call "partial birth" abortion is made murkier by arguments about how to define it.

In the government's most recent estimate of abortion rates, California, New Hampshire and West Virginia reported no data, resulting in a significant undercount. It appears that only one state, Kansas, specifically lists "partial birth procedure" in its survey of practitioners.

The best estimate appears to be by the nonprofit Guttmacher Institute in New York, which researches reproductive health issues. In 2000, the last time it studied the question, the institute estimated there were 1.31 million abortions performed in the United States each year. Of that total, about 2,200, or 0.17 percent, were by "intact dilation and extraction," which is the medical term for the same procedure.

How sad abortion rightists must be not to be able to murder those 2200 babies each year. I mean, after all, their only a drop in the bucket of the millions they already eagerly sacrifice in the name of selfish hedonism. Don't believe me? How about this little statement from the Post article...

"There is definitely a concern that this ruling could come down and really affect procedures done as early as 12 weeks," said Amy Hagstrom Miller, board chairman of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers. "The providers want to know that what we do is okay. We are the kind of people that comply with laws."

Awww, those poor baby killers, now they might have to exercise some care and judgment before they choose to murder an unborn human being. My heart just aches for their unfortunate and overly burdened lives. I mean they should be free to murder at will...not that they haven't done a pretty good job of it already. I would definitely say 1.3 million dead babies each year (assuming those numbers are correct) is a pretty good death toll even by today's standards.

Damn folks! This whole nation just went into and are still in outpourings of anguish over the unacceptable murder of 32 students at Virginia Tech this week...32! Each year we lose 1.3 million new lives to the knives of butchers in our "abortion clinics" and we are concerned over the loss of 32 lives? Yes those lives were precious beyond price. Those families will suffer over their losses for the remainder of their lives. We justly grieve; I grieve for those relatives and friends of those who were lost, but aren't we a little out of perspective here?

Imagine the potential of those 1.3 million lives 30 years down the road. This cost is immeasurable and the loss irretrievable. Thank God for this small move back up the road of sanity by our SCOTUS, or atleast those who still retain some measure of their humanity (Conservatives).

Darth Vader Ginsberg's opposing opinion took issue with the Justice Kennedy's wording in his majority opinion. She stated:

"Throughout, the opinion refers to obstetrician-gynecologists and surgeons who perform abortions not by the titles of their medical specialties, but by the pejorative label `abortion doctor,'" wrote Ginsburg. "A fetus is described as an 'unborn child,' and as a 'baby;' second-trimester, previability abortions are referred to as 'late-term.'"

According to this hag, it is perfectly acceptable to de-humanize an unborn baby with the clinically cold term of "fetus," but she bridles at the use of the term "abortion doctor" to describe her pet genocidal "surgeons and ob-gyn's." Funny how beauty, (or "un-beauty" in this case) is in the eye of the beholder. Hey Ruthy, I'm sure you would prefer that we on the right use the euphemisms that you on the Left use to de-humanize and objectify the targets of your malevolent will, but sorry you old harpy, that just ain't gonna happen.

There is little doubt that this is going to play really big in the upcoming months and as we approach the next election, the Left is going to be vicious in their campaigns. This one small correction of a monsterous evil will galvanize the Left like nothing else can possibly do.

The SCOTUS has gored (however slightly) the most sacred of Liberal oxen. There is no higher calling on the Left than the right to kill the unborn.

God Bless the Supreme Court of the United States!

Long Live the American Republic!!

What do you think?

To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below