Dionne’s Non-Intellect, Non-Accuracy, Non-Argument

Well, here we go again, one of my all-time Democrat Shills telling lies and distorting facts to suit his back-room buddies like Soros, and Reid. Once more one of the self-nominated “tellers of truths” seems not to know what the word even means. It is hard to fathom that anyone who has observed the “conversation” on Iraq over the past four years could lay the blame for “petty partisan squabble” at the feet of the President and Vice-President.A more laughable assertion can’t possibly be made. Certainly Mr. Dionne must have been laughing himself into hysterics when he wrote this article; either that or he is more than intellectually challenged.

Such hubris has become the routine fare served up by the Democrat shills (or poseurs) in the Paleo-media. Such blatently dishonest assertions are one of the prime reasons for the failing fortunes of those once bastions of jaded journalism. Liberals have always been Narcissistic and arrogant, but only recently have they become so blatent in their disregard for the truth, and so transparent in their motives.

Blaming President Bush for the “partisan nature” of the national political discourse, is like blaming the victim of an assassin’s bullet. The Democrats, from the very first day of this President’s first term in office, have been engaged in a never-ending full scale war against the President and any and all of his initiatives, his person, his family, and his administration.

Anyway, here’s Dionne latest pile of bovine manure:

Bush’s Non-Argument

By E. J. Dionne Jr.
Friday, April 27, 2007; Page A23

President Bush and Vice President Cheney cannot make the case that their Iraq policies have succeeded, so they are doing one thing they do very well: taking a serious argument over the future of American foreign policy and turning it into a petty partisan squabble.

This is not really an argument over the “surge” of troops into Iraq. It is a fight over whether we want to make an open-ended commitment to keeping combat forces in Iraq for many years or whether we anticipate pulling most of them out within a year or two.

Even if the surge succeeds in a narrow sense — by reducing the number of Iraqis killed in sectarian violence in Baghdad — there is no guarantee that the overall situation in Iraq will be any better, no guarantee that Iraqi leaders will take the political steps necessary to end the internecine killing and create a stable government, no guarantee that we will make progress against al-Qaeda.

Although he conveniently appeared in Washington as Congress was voting on war appropriations, Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, did not play politics Wednesday in assessing the situation there. He spoke, rightly, of progress in Anbar province, a Sunni stronghold, but added “The ability of al-Qaeda to conduct horrific, sensational attacks obviously has represented a setback and is an area in which we are focusing considerable attention.”

Mr. Dionne, at no time did General David Patraeus imply that “the ability of al-Qaeda to conduct horrific, sensationalist attacks” was insurmountable. Nor did he at anytime suggest in any way that we were “in trouble” or “failing,” or in anyway in difficulty or in danger of losing…provided Congress doesn’t surrender before we succeed, as they are desperate to do.

You are correct about one thing, “This is not really an argument over the “surge” of troops into Iraq.” This is a battle over whether or not America will live up to our commitments regardless of the cost. This is a battle over whether or not America will surrender to a force which is determined, not to stop at the borders of Iraq or Afghanistan, but determined to destroy America and all that for which it stands. This is a battle against those who would see us fighting (or more likely surrendering to radical Islam rather than fighting) on our own streets rather than stopping an oppressive, aggressive and determined enemy before they have the opportunity to build a base of operations from which they will most certainly attack our nation and our allies…as they have already done.

Mr. Dionne goes on to state:

What Bush and Cheney are doing is not just wrong. It’s dangerous. If they were interested in success in Iraq, they would have turned down the partisan rhetoric long ago. A substantial majority now opposes their policies. The last thing the administration needs is more polarization, which clearly has not worked in its favor.

He would be correct, if it was the administration who initiated the “partisan rhetoric,” oh yeah, “long ago” instead of liars and shills like him and his Democrat managers.

It has long been an obvious trait of the Left that they feel entitled to launch any attack, make any criticism, make any assertion, without feeling any remorse or responsibility. They are so arrogant that they naturally assume that whatever they say, no matter how absurd or insincere, should be automatically accepted without comment. They routinely drop little political bombs into even their most casual conversations and take it as given that no one will object or disagree. After all, they are alway correct in their assessments.

This is why they become so indignant when they encounter someone who refuses to passively sit back and allow them to spout off without contradiction. I have experienced this reaction personally, numerous times, in the course of a casual conversation with my Liberal acquaintances and even those I consider to be close personal friends.

How dare I disagree with their Liberal world view? Well frankly, I just got tired of acquiescing to their constant, inane, presumptive, babble. I got tired of being condescended to while listening in polite silence…apparently President Bush and Vice-President Chenney have as well…I hope so. I hope other Conservatives will as well.

It is well past time for the Conservatives to follow the lead of people like Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, and Rush Limbaugh. Stop being polite. Stop listening to their lies without objecting. Dare to contradict their propaganda. You’d be amazed how good it feels to assert your own beliefs and how often it will completely set them back on their heels. Just be prepare for the verbal assault and insulting laughter of their disdain for your opinion; after all who are you to question their wisdom and natural superiority?

Long Live This American Republic!

What do you think?

To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below