...by the pricking of my thumbs, something liberal this way comes.



In A Dangerous World “Dangerous” McCain Better than “Diplomatic” Obama



Click for Houston, Texas Forecast


Saturday, January 13, 2007

Secretary Rice Responds to Senator Boxer's Malicious Personal Attack

Senator Boxhead...excuse me, I always get that name confused, Boxer has again confirmed her extremist Left-wing credentials, in making her unwarranted, irrelevent, intentionally malicious, personal attack on Condaleezza Rice in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee meeting Thursday. Such transparent hatefullness is generally a sign of a limited intellect and Senator Box...er is a person of very limited intellect.


Rice Criticizes Sen. Boxer's Comment on War
Associated Press
Saturday, January 13, 2007; Page A15

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice yesterday criticized Sen. Barbara Boxer's suggestion that, because she does not have family in harm's way, she will pay no "personal price" in the Iraq war.

"In retrospect, gee, I thought single women had come further than that, that the only question is, 'Are you making good decisions because you have kids?' " Rice said on Fox News.

---------snip-------------

"Who pays the price?" Boxer (D-Calif.) asked Rice, who is unmarried and has no children. "I'm not going to pay a personal price. My kids are too old, and my grandchild is too young. You're not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with immediate family. So who pays the price? The American military and their families."

Boxer defended herself in a statement. "I spoke the truth at the committee hearing, which is that neither Secretary Rice nor I have family members that will pay the price for this escalation," she said.
We are once more confronted by the old tried and untrue Liberal tactic of claiming that a person cannot have a legitimate opinion on an issue if they don't have some personal experience or stake in the resolution of that issue. Over and over again, Liberals have made these same claims and over and over again, I have rejected them.

Our justice system is based on just the opposite principle. We are judged not by a panel of judges or by a single judge (unless we so request), we are judged by a jury of our peers. The assumption behind this is that 12 citizens are completely capable of empathizing with all of the issues surrounding a case, evaluate them, and come to a decision on the legitimacy of them. Somehow this concept excapes Babs and the rest of her mentally deranged Liberal fellow travellers.

Barbara Boxer's comments were rude. They were intended to be rude and hurtful. Because she has no legitimate reasoned argument to counter the administration's Iraq policy, she chose-as is the want of all Liberals-to make an ad hominem attack against Secretary Rice.

See the problem for the Democrats is that Secretary Rice absolutely ate the Democrat Senators' lunches Thursday, making them look like the idiots they are and they hate her for it. But even more than hating her for being smarter than they are, they hate her because she doesn't act the way they believe black women are supposed to act. For Democrats, no black person is legitimate if they aren't Liberals. They hate Condi because she isn't back on the Democrat plantation doing their bidding and taking their hand-outs.

Tell me Senator Boxer, who is more qualified to make judgments about war and how to conduct it. The person who, because they have no child involved, can make an objective assessment on how best to successfully achieve America's objective, or the person who, because they do have a child involved, is likely to allow that fact to cloud their judgment and influence their decision making process?

[il]Liberals are so emotional...

To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below

2 Comments:

Blogger Tamara Lambert said...

I do not think it at all appropriate for you to criticize Barbara Boxer's intelect. The reason? The first thing I noticed upon entering this blog was your glaring grammatical goof under the "fair warning" It isn't "DO to..." It's "DUE to..." The second thing I noticed upon entering this blog was your criticizing someone else's intelect. Or is it INTELLECT? My point is we all make mistakes, but it isn't right to be so critical when your own mistake has probably been noticed by all who enter your blog.--Tamara Lambert

3:45 PM  
Blogger Will Malven said...

I beg to differ with you Tamara, typo's aside, BABs is an idiot of the first order. I have never heard her utter an intelligent word.

It's not her mistakes I criticize, it is her whole underservedly arrogant attitude.

Boxer never claimed she made a "mistake" what she did was malicious and intentional. She is a hateful little Liberal who cares not one whit for anyone but herself.

Liberals like yourself receive contempt from Conservatives because you react with your emotions rather than with reason. Probably because you have no reasoning ability.

Barbara Boxhead is one of the most dangerous people on this planet; a stupid person with the power of a United States Senator.

My mistakes were of carelessness and haste. She made no mistake, she stated exactly what she intended. She even reaffirmed what she had said later.

Her office released a statement saying that "Senator Boxer spoke the truth at the Committee."

5:23 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home