Iraq Defiant. Gee, I Wonder Why That Is?

Iran Defies Deadline On Nuclear Program
U.S. to Press U.N. To Impose Sanctions

By Dafna Linzer
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 1, 2006; Page A01

A defiant Iran faced the prospect of economic sanctions after U.N. inspectors reported that the country ignored yesterday's deadline to halt its nuclear program and has been hindering efforts to determine whether it seeks to secretly develop nuclear weapons.

President Bush, invoking the same language that he used to describe Iraq before the March 2003 invasion, called Iran a "grave threat" and said "there must be consequences" for Tehran's actions. "It is time for Iran to make a choice," Bush said in a speech to the American Legion's national convention in Salt Lake City.

His administration had offered to join talks with Iran and held out the possibility of future cooperation after 27 years' enmity, if Tehran met the United Nations' deadline for suspending its nuclear program. Yesterday, however, U.S. officials said they will demand international sanctions against the Iranian government.

"We are going to move this toward a sanctions resolution at the United Nations," said R. Nicholas Burns, undersecretary of state for political affairs. "We expect others to join us."

Iran and Ahmadinejad are defiant and unafraid,how can this be? Well, how about a multiple choice?

1. Mahmoud is just a really nice guy and Iran has been so peaceful, they deserve to have a Nuclear Arsenal.
2. Mahmoud is just a really nice guy and he is right to feel threatened by those big old meanies the United States of America and President Bush, the real enemies of good, so he needs his Nuclear Arsenal to Protect himself from us.
3. Mahmoud is a nut-job of the first order and he is President of a nation which is run by a bunch of nut-job Muslim theocrats so they don't understand what actions the United Nations might take.
4. Mahmoud is a clever guy and he has heard the repeated cries for surrender and appeasement in Iraq and the rest of the Middle East by the Paleo-media, Democrats and Liberals here in America that he believes he has enough allies in Congress to protect him from the President and he knows that a threat from the UN is a nuisance, rather than a problem with which to be reckoned.

I know, you Democrats and Libs out there are shouting out "Two!, Two!" Wrong, the correct answer is "Four!" Democrats have made seizing back control of the United States Government, their paramount raison d'etre. In their zeal to throw President Bush out of office, they would willingly tolerate a nuclear armed Iran. They believe that our President is a greater threat to the world than the homicidal maniac ruling Iran, than the homicidal maniac ruling Hamas, the homicidal maniac ruling Hizbollah, or even the homicidal maniac ruling al Qaeda.

Democrats have ceased to be the "loyal opposition," to become the disloyal, traitorous enemy sympathizers. They oppose any possible victory in Iraq because it might help the Republicans. They would rather have America appear completely inept and incapable of defending herself just so that they can regain the power they believe to be theirs by divine right. They would invite another 9-11 disaster just so they would benefit politically.

Boxer, Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy, Feingold, Murtha, and their ilk don't care about anything but political power (Oops! and booze, sorry Teddy).

If you Democrats want to know why Mahmoud Amahdinejad is defiant, you need look no further than the mirror. If you so-called Democrat "Leaders" want to know why America may be forced to nuke Iran, just look in the mirror, for you are the cause.

Full Story: UN Threatens Sanctions, Ooh Iran's Sooo Scared

What do you think?

To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below