Anti-Duke Lacrosse Team Bias of Washington Post Exposed...Again

Another Dancer Doubted Allegations
Associated Press
Saturday, June 10, 2006; Page A08

DURHAM, N.C., June 9 -- Lawyers for a Duke University lacrosse player charged with raping a stripper at a team party say another dancer at the party initially doubted the accuser's charges, and that a medical examination of the accuser revealed injuries inconsistent with her story, a court filing shows.

The second dancer, Kim Roberts, told a police detective who interviewed her a week after the alleged assault that she was with the accuser most of the night and that the charges were a "crock."

Why is this a page 8 story when the allegations made against the Duke Lacrosse Team were front page material? Shouldn't a revelation of this magnitude, one that is exculpatatory of these much maligned college kids also be page one material?

Why is this woman, the OTHER dancer, called in the headline simply "Another dancer," as though to imply that she was only peripherally involved in the case, when if fact she was present (with the exception of 5 minutes) throughout the entire incident?

Is it possible that the Washington Post has a hidden agenda here?

This is a blatant example of the pervasive Left-biased presentation of the news as provided by the Washington Pest...er...Post.

Further proof that the Paleo-media is nothing more that a Left-wing propaganda machine and it's entire raison d'etre is to promote the agenda of the Democrat Party.

Full Story: Exculpatory Evidence Virtually Ignored by Post

What do you think?

To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below