...by the pricking of my thumbs, something liberal this way comes.



Deconstructing Obama's War Myth: Troop Surge Instrumental in Iraq Victory



Click for Houston, Texas Forecast Watch Will Malven On
FREEDOM BROADCAST NETWORK

Channel 11 - Straight Talk!



Friday, May 26, 2006

WMD Sent to Syria? Dear Me! What Will the Liberals Say Now?

Iraq, WMDs and Troubling Revelations

By Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com
May 26, 2006

Just recently, Saddam Hussein's former southern regional commander, Gen. Al-Tikriti,
gave the first videotaped testimony confirming that Iraq had WMDs up to the American invasion in 2003 and that Russia helped removed them prior to the war. His testimony confirms numerous other sources that have pointed to Russia's secret alliance with Iraq and the co-ordinated moving of WMDs before the American liberation. Today we've invited three experts on this subject to discuss the details of Al-Tikriti's testimony and its larger significance.

--------------Exerpt---------------

General Al-Tikriti was known as the "Butcher of Basra" and was a southern regional commander for Saddam Hussein, a friend of his. He defected shortly before the Gulf War but has maintained contacts inside Iraq ever since, including weapons scientists.

He has confirmed in previous interviews that Iraq sent nuclear scientists and technology to Libya in the mid-1990s to continue his WMD programs, and that Syria is the holding place for Iraqi WMD today. He said that he had first-hand knowledge of discussions between Iraq and Syria to send their weapons programs to the other for safe harbor, should either Baghdad or Damascus be threatened with occupation.

In this videotape, he has his voice modified and face blacked out. However, I have sources who were at the taping, and who confirmed with the Iraqi embassy that he is legit. In this tape, he confirms that Russia had a secret alliance with Iraq, and that plans were developed to remove WMD from Iraq before an invasion. The Russians obviously wanted to cover their tracks.
This is dynamite. If this can be confirmed, than we learn 1. That President Bush was not "lying, manipulating intelligence, or exaggerating" in his speeches to the American people. 2. That there was more involved in Russia's opposition to the Iraq War than first met the eye.

What is a self-respecting, Bush hating, Liberal to do? The entire premise for the "Impeach Bush" movement has suddenly evaporated. Will pandemonium rule the Left now? I doubt it, when opinion is substituted for fact, and denial of reality rules your life, this information will hardly ruffle their self-assured arrogance. They are certain to cry "Foul!" and "Conspiracy!" as is typical when they are confronted with evidence of their own fallability.

It is possible that this will turn out to be false, but I doubt it. I have never given in to those who repeatedly claim that WMD's were not ever in Iraq, that they were trumped up by President Bush to justify "his" war.

Full Story: Red-Faced Liberals
To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home