Congress: Researching WMD Manufacturing Techniques NOT a Threat

Patriot Act Compromise Clears Way for Senate Vote

By Charles Babington
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, February 10, 2006; Page A01

Efforts to extend the USA Patriot Act cleared a major hurdle yesterday when the White House and key senators agreed to revisions that are virtually certain to secure Senate passage and likely to win House approval, congressional leaders said.

The law -- passed in the wake of the 2001 terrorist attacks and scheduled to lapse in key areas last year -- makes it easier for federal agents to secretly tap phones, obtain library and bank records, and search the homes of suspected terrorists. Several Democrats said the compromise announced yesterday lacks important civil liberties safeguards, and even the Republican negotiators said they had to yield to the administration on several points.

But with virtually all 55 GOP senators now on board, and Democrats joining them, the plan appears to have enough support to overcome the Senate filibuster that has thwarted a four-year renewal of the statute for months. Senators said they think the White House will be able to coax the Republican-controlled House to agree as well, even though House leaders have complained that senators' demands had weakened the measure.

"It was a bipartisan group of us that really believed we could do better . . . to protect civil liberties even as we gave law enforcement important tools to conduct terrorism investigations," Sen. John E. Sununu (R-N.H.) told reporters. He said that he and his fellow negotiators had to make more concessions to the administration than they wanted to, but that Congress will monitor the law's application over the coming years and perhaps revise it.

Sen. Richard J. Durbin (Ill.), one of several Democrats who agreed to back the compromise yesterday, said "it falls far short" of the bill that was passed by the Senate last year but rejected by the House. "But if you measure it against the original Patriot Act . . . we've made progress" toward "protecting basic civil liberties at a time when we are dealing with the war on terrorism," Durbin said.

Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) called the compromise "a step in the right direction."

The proposal would restrict federal agents' access to library records, one of the Patriot Act's most contentious provisions. A form of secret subpoena known as a National Security Letter could no longer be used to obtain records from libraries that function "in their traditional capacity, including providing basic Internet access," Sununu and others said in a statement. But libraries that are "Internet service providers" would remain subject to the letters, Durbin said.

Well, I'm glad that's settled, now Durbin can go check out "Debbie Does Congress" without the FBI finding out. Of all the things in the world I would pick to worry about, I have to admit that my library records becoming public, let alone known to the FBI, hasn't been one of them. Not even in my wildest dream. I guess the paranoia of some knows no bounds. It has never occurred to me to be concerned with what the federal government thought about the fact that I might wish to read "Portnoy's Complaint" or "The Communist Manifesto" or even, God forbid, Al Gore's "Earth In the Balance." I guess maybe Reid didn't want anyone to find out that his reading list includes his auto-biography "Curious Harry Goes to Washington" and Dr. Seuss' "The Rat in the Senate." Never mind that terrorists might be accessing unsecured information that might enable them to strike at us in some unforseen manner or to manufacture some deadle device to use on the American people, our library records are safe.

Full Story: At Last My Library Records are Safe

What do you think?

To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below