Rolling the Supreme Court Dice
High Court Nominee Has Never Been a Judge
By DEB RIECHMANN
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - President Bush nominated White House counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court on Monday, turning to a lawyer who has never been a judge to replace Sandra Day O'Connor and help reshape the nation's judiciary.
"She has devoted her life to the rule of law and the cause of justice," Bush said as his first Supreme Court pick, Chief Justice John Roberts, took the bench for the first time just a few blocks from the White House.
If confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate, Miers, 60, would join Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as the second woman on the nation's highest court and the third to serve there. Miers was the first woman to serve as president of the Texas State Bar and the Dallas Bar Association.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist outlined a timetable calling for confirmation by Thanksgiving — a tight timetable by recent standards that allowed less than eight weeks for lawmakers to review her record, hold hearings and vote. Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, made no commitment, saying he wanted a thorough confirmation proceeding.
O'Connor has been the court's majority maker in dozens of controversial cases in recent years, casting deciding votes that upheld the 1973 ruling that established the constitutional right to an abortion, sustaining affirmative action programs and limiting the application of the death penalty.
Within hours of Bush's announcement in the Oval Office, Miers travelled to the Capitol to begin courtesy calls on the senators who will vote on her nomination.
Am I happy about this? In a word NO! This is a betrayal. Anyone that Reid is comfortable with, worries me extensively. She may be great, or she may be another Souter, the point is why should we have to guess at all. Why isn't she a hard core originalist.
Full Story: Harriet Meirs







1 Comments:
I agree. As a displaced New Orleanian, I can't help but wonder - does anyone see the link between Brown of FEMA's inexperience and Miers' inexperience? Is the Supreme Court an appropriate place for your loyal lawyer friends, and do we really want to send inexperience right to the top? I loath to think we'll have a justice who is "learning on the job." The Supreme Court is an important institution and we deserve better. I hope the momentum grows to send this one back to the drawing board.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home