...by the pricking of my thumbs, something liberal this way comes.



In A Dangerous World “Dangerous” McCain Better than “Diplomatic” Obama



Click for Houston, Texas Forecast Watch Will Malven On
FREEDOM BROADCAST NETWORK

Channel 11 - Straight Talk!



Thursday, October 27, 2005

Heating Aid Program, Typical Government Program

Bid for More Home Heating Aid Fails in Senate

Associated Press
Thursday, October 27, 2005; Page A02

The Senate decided yesterday the money was not there for a substantial spending boost for the federal home heating program, deflecting arguments that soaring energy prices could force the poor to choose between heat and food this winter.

Senators voted 54 to 43 in favor of a proposal to boost the fiscal 2006 budget for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program from $2.2 billion to $5.1 billion. A 60-vote majority was needed to approve new spending not coupled with equivalent spending cuts.

Northern senators who pushed for increased spending for the program, led by Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), argued that low-income families would be particularly hurt by the surge in fuel costs.

People could have to "choose between keeping the heat on, putting food on the table or buying much-needed prescription drugs," Collins said. "No family should need to make such terrible choices."

Reed cited estimates that those who heat their homes with fuel oil will need $1,600 this winter, up $380, and the cost of using natural gas for heating could rise $500, to $1,400.

The Senate also defeated, 53 to 46, an alternative put forward by Budget Committee Chairman Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) that would have increased spending on the program by about $1.3 billion. The measure would have paid for the increase with an across-the-board cut of almost 1 percent in programs included in a $146 billion spending bill covering health, education and labor programs.

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) said that education grants for low-income children would be cut by $118 million, affecting 37,000 youths, and that Head Start would lose $63 million.

It was the third time this month that Reed unsuccessfully offered a LIHEAP amendment to a spending bill. He said he would keep trying.

This is so very typical of government programs. Does anyone remember when this program was first created? It was going to be a temporary measure to assist those in the north who were faced with unprecedented increases in heating oil prices due to the Oil Embargo. That embargo ended two decades ago. There is nothing unexpected in the higher oil prices of today. This is another tax-money give away by those in Congress with socialist leanings which has metasticized into another entitlement.

Full Story: Senate Actually Acts Responsibly
To leave your opinion click on the word "COMMENT(S)" below

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home